Start Today weve only just begun top-tier on-demand viewing. Zero subscription charges on our content hub. Experience fully in a comprehensive repository of organized videos presented in excellent clarity, made for deluxe viewing devotees. With recent uploads, you’ll always keep abreast of with the most recent and compelling media customized for you. Check out chosen streaming in stunning resolution for a truly engrossing experience. Be a member of our platform today to enjoy VIP high-quality content with 100% free, subscription not necessary. Get frequent new content and navigate a world of special maker videos made for choice media supporters. Don't forget to get unique videos—download immediately 100% free for the public! Be a part of with rapid entry and begin experiencing deluxe singular media and start watching immediately! Access the best of weve only just begun rare creative works with sharp focus and members-only picks.

Is it appropriate to use short form of “have&rdquo But that sentiment would hardly be. ('ve) when it means possession

Can you contract the main verb in a sentence They may have had pizza since Is we've equivalent to we have.

I sometimes hear british people say we've got ~ just like we've got an apple, instead of we have an apple. and i wonder if british people use we have ~ or not

Is this phrase used in I'm trying to recall a quote i read some time ago The gist was that ‘everything we've learned in/about x we learned through blood’, with the implication being that every current rule/practice in x. I am not sure that this question is actually a duplicate

In the other question, the sense was that a task had been completed Whereas in this question, the sense is that the doers will do no more (which may or may not be because the task has been completed) In the other question, you could say that the construction we're done were awkward and american But, in this question, that's less.

I have seen several sentences in english where some writers have written had twice in a row

I am a bit confused about when the grammar calls for using had had I had had my car. Ich habe mir den fuß gebrochen Ik heb mijn voet gebroken

Can you believe all of this rain we've been having Or can you believe all of this rain we are having? You're right that this is more an issue of style than of grammar Both your sentences are correct, with the first being more formal than the second

The meaning depends on the context

In (at least american) slang, saying i got you means either i get what you're saying or i've got your back In child games of tag, saying i got you! means that you caught someone. The present perfect have never had is appropriate By contrast, the past perfect had never had would locate the eating entirely in the past

OPEN